Thursday, November 03, 2011

Spot-fixing and sentencing: The injustice of it all

Spot-fixing gets you sent to jail. That much has been established. The world of cricket has now paid witness to a historic trial, which has resulted in three Pakistani cricketers, Salman Butt, Mohammed Asif and Mohammed Aamer being sentenced for their roles in last year's no-ball scandal. This has, besides the usual grim humor, sparked some plaintive complaints who suggest the sentences were a) too harsh "jail time for no-balls?" or b) too unforgiving "Pakistani cricketers live such unimaginably hard lives, they practically had to fix a match or two in order to make it to the next day". Another theme is that this scandal shows cricket administration in a poor light (its hard to know whether to describe this as a theme or as the latest emanation from the We Like Shooting Fish in a Barrel Brigade). Lastly, there are some confused mutterings about cricket being hypocritical: we send fixers to jail but we don't crack down on all these other bad things: sledging or not walking, for instance.

Right. It might be useful to keep things straight. Fixing has long been a scandal in the game, and its continued presence has always threatened to render the game a joke. That this sorry mess went to trial was a relief; it afforded a break from the usual sequence of matchfixing scandal followed by board cover-up (usually carried out by the PCB). The accused had legal representation (some of it expensive and of high-quality); the trial was fair; the legal procedures for due process were followed and sentences have been announced. The three cricketers broke the law of the land (where the games were being staged) and have been punished by the law. There has been no suggestion of railroading, of a kangaroo court, or of any sort of legal impropriety.

So, I'd like to get clear on something: Where is the injustice? Are the laws unfair? Should Great Britain not have certain laws on its books? Should charges not have been filed? Or does the injustice lie in something rather more cosmic: Economic inequality in the world of cricket, which makes Pakistani cricketers do bad things? The unfairness of an incompetently run cricket world bearing witness to an efficient dispensation?

Labels: ,


Blogger Soulberry said...

No injustice done by law.

The injustice however lay in the substance of live commentators who did a U-turn as verdict day approached to be facing the opposite direction to all their views till the previous nights.

Imran Khan is talking something on TV I cannot quite understand but he was a huge Amir and Butt I guess disappointment makes him sound confused.

This is just a small step, but significant one, towards a cleaner game. Mountain ranges remain

7:45 AM  
Blogger Krystal said...

I am the sports editor for Before It's News and we are looking to add quality sports news to our site. We would love it if Eye on the Pitch would contribute. There is no extra work for you. We will simply take the full feed from your RSS feed and re-post it to our site, along with a link back to your website. You are more than welcome to also link your FB and Twitter accounts and post any message to our readers before or after your post.

We have 4 million visitors a month, so this would be great exposure for your site.

If this is something you are interested in, please let me know. If you have any questions about my proposal, don't hesitate to ask.

Have a great day,

8:28 PM  
Anonymous Santosh John Samuel said...

Samir, just wanted and opinion on this one: Should not the ICC remove the bans on these three players once their court sentences get over? My point is that all prior rulings should cease to exist once a court decides upon a case. The ICC could go in for an appeal to increase the quantum of punishment, but penalise only once.
Although both processes are different, being punished twice does not seem right. It could also be possible for a court in Pakistan to decide to punish further? What then?

2:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home